Passive Absorption in BTC — July 17, 2026
A quantitative overview of cross-venue structural stability, liquidity trajectories, and intraday regime transitions.
1. Regime & Volatility Analysis
Venue/Instrument | Event Type | Time (UTC) | Confidence | Key Metric |:-----------------|:-----------|:-----------|:-----------|:----------- | [Deribit Options] [212] | Passive Absorption | 2 minutes ago | 0.8000 | efficiency_ratio: 0.00, vpin: 1.00 | [OkxLinear BTC-USDT] | Liquidation Cascade | 4 minutes ago | 0.7000 | oi_velocity: -23.77 BPS | [Deribit BTC-PERPETUAL] | Failed Expansion | 5 minutes ago | 0.8000 | duration_bars: 1.00, exit_regime: Absorption | [Deribit BTC-24JUL26] | Passive Absorption | 5 minutes ago | 0.8000 | efficiency_ratio: 0.00, vpin: 1.00 | [BybitInverse BTCUSD] | Momentum Exhaustion | 20 minutes ago | 0.7500 | efficiency_ratio: 0.0912, oi_velocity: -77.38 BPS | [Hyperliquid BTC] | Liquidation Cascade | 26 minutes ago | 0.7000 | oi_velocity: -35.23 BPS | [Bybit BTCPERP] | Liquidation Cascade | 40 minutes ago | 0.7000 | oi_velocity: -86.58 BPS The market was predominantly in an Absorption regime, accounting for 81880 state blocks, indicating sustained passive buying. This structural stability was challenged by 43 Liquidation Cascade events and 42 Failed Expansion events, suggesting periods of volatility and rejected upward price movements. Minor Compression (177 blocks) and Exhaustion (42 blocks) regimes were also observed, indicating localized liquidity engineering and directional impetus depletion. Extract the raw multi-venue Parquet tick data for this epoch via thrunode_archive
It visualizes the structural behavior of Bitcoin across the industry's most important trading venues.
- Venues (Y): Specific markets from Spot to Perps.
- Time (X): 24-hour day broken into 48 discrete 30-minute segments.
- Teal Blocks: Absorption. Passive liquidity absorbing aggressive flow.
- Brightness: Bright = High Conviction. Faint = Transitional/Noisy.
- White Lines: Abrupt Structural Transitions.
- Grey Line (Hurst): Price persistence (High = trend, Low = noise).
2. Liquidation Risks & Funding Trajectories
Funding trajectories exhibited divergence, with [BybitInverse BTCUSD] showing elevated funding (+1.62 Z) indicative of crowded long positioning, while [Deribit BTC-PERPETUAL] experienced negative funding (-1.39 Z) suggesting localized short pressure. Liquidation cascades on [Bybit BTCPERP] (OI velocity: -86.58 BPS), [OkxLinear BTC-USDT] (OI velocity: -23.77 BPS), and [Hyperliquid BTC] (OI velocity: -35.23 BPS) confirmed deleveraging events and long squeeze risks throughout the day. Elevated leverage pockets on [Binance BTCUSDT] and [OkxInverse BTC-USD] maintained vulnerability for further unwinds. Verified Execution & Macro Proofs: * (See Verified Execution below) * (See Verified Execution below) ## Verified Execution & Macro Proofs • 420,000,000 USDT (220,000,000 USDT on Ethereum, 100,000,000 USDT on Ethereum, 100,000,000 USDT on Ethereum) • 45.20 bps (Source Date: 2026-06-24) Extract the raw multi-venue Parquet tick data for this epoch via thrunode_archive
This chart is the Squeeze Radar, a specialized risk map for Bitcoin derivative markets. It visualizes the "tension" in the market by tracking where the most dangerous liquidation risks are building up across major exchanges.
The chart is divided into four sections based on two critical factors: Position Crowdedness (Vertical Axis) and Holding Cost (Horizontal Axis).
- The Red Zone (Top-Right - "Long Squeeze Danger"): This is the danger zone. Positions here have rising Open Interest (more people piling in) and high Funding Rates (buyers are paying a premium to stay long). If the price drops slightly, these "crowded longs" may be forced to sell all at once, causing a crash.
- The Green Zone (Bottom-Left - "Short Covering Exhaustion"): This is the "relief" zone. Positions here have falling Open Interest (shorts are closing) and negative Funding (sellers are paying buyers). This usually signals that a downward move is running out of steam.
- The Circles (Nodes): The solid circles represent where those exchanges ended the day.
- The Size of the Circle: The larger the circle, the more trading volume that exchange handled.
- The Dashed Trails (Trajectories): These "scribbles" are the most important part—they show the path each exchange took over the last 24 hours. Instead of just a single data point, you can see the "journey" of the market sentiment.
3. Passive Liquidity & CVD Divergences
Passive absorption was the dominant structural event, with 160 instances detected, primarily across [Deribit] instruments, indicating significant passive liquidity walls absorbing aggressive selling pressure. Orderbook imbalances were evident through elevated funding rates on [BybitInverse BTCUSD] (+1.62 Z) and [Binance BTCUSDT] (+1.71 Z), diverging from declining Open Interest (OI) velocity on [OkxLinear BTC-USDT] (-25.09 BPS). This divergence suggests speculative long positioning being absorbed by passive bids, creating a fragile market structure. Extract the raw multi-venue Parquet tick data for this epoch via thrunode_archive
This chart visualizes the true macroeconomic divergence between Global Spot and Derivative markets. By aggregating liquidity across all canonical exchanges, it acts as a highly sensitive gauge for systemic buying or selling pressure.
CVD tracks aggressive market orders (market buys minus market sells). We aggregate this across all canonical exchanges into two distinct curves:
- Spot CVD (The "Real" Demand): Tracks actual asset accumulation. When this rises, actual assets are being bought and removed from order books.
- Perp CVD (The Speculative Demand): Tracks derivative traders using leverage. Divergences (e.g., Perp CVD rising while Spot CVD drops) often signal fragile, easily-liquidated trends.
- Order Book Imbalance (Background): The background heatmap shows the structural weight of passive limit orders. Brighter colors indicate passive liquidity walls stepping in to absorb aggressive volume.
- Macro Events (Vertical Lines): We filter billions of daily ticks to cluster systemic structural events—like Global Liquidation Cascades or massive Block Trades—across multiple exchanges simultaneously.